The Sound of Silence

Earlier this week, blogger K.T. Bradford made waves online by posting her challenge to “stop reading white, straight, cis, male authors for a year.” Her point was to question what we might gain when we temporarily silence the voices that have the loudest platforms and are most easily accessible in our culture? The answer, it seems, is that we find a richness of expression, diverse experiences, and, ultimately, a stronger pool of literature. Her experiment and subsequent challenge to her audience went … about as well as you expect it would. White men of the internet predictably rose up in a collective cry of “Discrimination!” and “Reverse Sexism/Racism!”

There's a lot of dead white dudes on my bookshelf.

There’s a lot of dead white dudes on my bookshelf.

There is a lot to unpack in this online controversy. The fact that notions such as reverse racism or reverse sexism do not actually exist, because the forces that feed into systemic oppression simply don’t work in the opposite direction. Or we might discuss how those of us who enjoy positions of privilege often enjoy a blissful ignorance when it comes to how those less privileged around us experience oppression in ways we will never comprehend. But these are complicated issues to discuss another day.

Instead, lets talk about Lent. It is effectively taken for granted these days that one observes the holy season of Lent by “giving up” something for the six weeks between Ash Wednesday and Easter. Why do we give something up–whether that’s chocolate, or alcohol, or sugar, or screen time? As I discussed last week, part of this practice of fasting is not because these items are “bad” in and of themselves. But a period of abstaining from something that has perhaps become excessive in our lives is a powerful way of cultivating mindfulness of how present that excessive consumption has become. Cutting out even 30 minutes or an hour with mobile can make us realize how much time we actually do spent staring at our screens–a reality of which we may have been previously unaware. Giving up meat for this brief period can be a pretty striking way of thinking “oh, wow…I didn’t realize I was so dependent on meat in my diet. I guess I need to go out of the way to eat more veggies on a regular basis.”  To put this conversation in a more fittingly spiritual perspective — a period of fasting and abstinence makes us aware of spaces where we have been crowding out God’s presence. Food and drink and casual entertainments are again not bad things in themselves. But they can become potential vices when they make us so comfortable in ourselves that we do not even realize how much space they are taking up and how little room we have made for God.

In that sense, I feel there is something very “Lenten” about the challenge K.T. Bradford proposes. Contrary to befuddled MRAs (Men’s Rights Activists) online, no one is saying we should no longer read straight, cis-gendered, white men anymore. I am not giving up my Neil Gaiman or my Terry Pratchett any time soon. I think what she IS getting at is challenging us to consider how disproportionately predominant those voices are in what gets published most often. To become aware of how often we gravitate towards voices that sound most like our own. It may sound like a drastic thing to cut out the most privileged voices, even if only temporarily. Sometimes, however, it is necessary to silence the loudest voices so that others may be heard. Sometimes, we have to say #BlackLivesMatter, because #AllLivesMatter ignores the particular trials endured by the Black community.

In comparing Bradford’s “challenge” to a Lenten discipline, it might seem that I am falling into the trap of secularizing the season of Lent as so many are prone to do — treating it as a season of “self-improvements” or opportunities for diets. That is not my intention. I dare say there is a deep spiritual imperative in what Bradford’s post suggests. We are, as people of faith, called to seek out and lift up the marginalized and affirm those less powerful in our society. When we see the degree to which certain voices still enjoy a broad platform we have a sacred responsibility to seek out those who do not. We have a calling to listen humbly to those whose experience might differ from our own.

There is a power in silence. It is the power to give others a chance to speak, and an opportunity for us to listen and to learn from them. It can be hard for those of us who enjoy certain forms of privilege (even just the privilege to have access to the internet to read this post) to realize that we may have to be silent in order to hear others speak. No doubt it is hard for the straight white dudes of the internet to cope with no longer being the default empowered voices. But it is the way to true equality and for a world that more fully reflects the values of God’s Kingdom.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “The Sound of Silence

  1. My one beef with the original post (other than how trollishly it was phrased, but people are actually talking about it, unlike more politely written posts about similar experiments) is when she mentions taking a break from Christian writers. In spec fic (and I get she isn’t specifically talking about spec fic here, but she’s a spec fic writer, so I’m holding her to that), there are so many atheist/agnostic/spiritual-but-not-religious writers that someone could really, really easily stick to them without changing their reading habits at all. Gaiman, Pratchett, Vonnegut, Arthur C. Clarke, Asimov, Heinlein, possibly Stephen King (I’m not sure if he still identifies as Christian or if he’s joined the “nones”) . . . I could keep going. Now, if you made it that you had to read writers who actively practiced non-Christian religions, that would be an interesting challenge.

  2. Yeah, that’s totally legitimate. And the post was rather trollish. There are aspects of what she said that could totally imply “buh, my life is so much better without straight white dudes.” So, I could maybe have done better to address those problematic points. I do think she raises an interesting experiment, and it’s the one getting the conversation going at the moment, even if there are others who have addressed the same concerns less hostilely.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s